Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Labs

If you want to be familiar with the real test and grasp the rhythm in the real test, you can choose our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam test engine to practice. Both our soft test engine and app test engine provide the exam scene simulation functions. You set timed Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test and practice again and again. Besides, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam test engine cover most valid test questions so that it can guide you and help you have a proficient & valid preparation process.

The Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) PDF dumps are suitable for smartphones, tablets, and laptops as well. So you can study actual Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) questions in PDF easily anywhere. Lead2PassExam updates Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) PDF dumps timely as per adjustments in the content of the actual Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. In the Desktop Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice exam software version of Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Test is updated and real. The software is useable on Windows-based computers and laptops. There is a demo of the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) practice exam which is totally free. Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) practice test is very customizable and you can adjust its time and number of questions.

>> Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample <<

Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample & Realistic Free PDF Quiz 2025 Databricks Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Reliable Exam Labs

Created on the exact pattern of the actual Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate tests, Lead2PassExam’s dumps comprise questions and answers and provide all important Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate information in easy to grasp and simplified content. The easy language does not pose any barrier for any learner. The complex portions of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification syllabus have been explained with the help of simulations and real-life based instances. The best part of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps are their relevance, comprehensiveness and precision. You need not to try any other source forDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam preparation. The innovatively crafted dumps will serve you the best; imparting you information in fewer number of questions and answers.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q27-Q32):

NEW QUESTION # 27
A Generative Al Engineer has developed an LLM application to answer questions about internal company policies. The Generative AI Engineer must ensure that the application doesn't hallucinate or leak confidential data.
Which approach should NOT be used to mitigate hallucination or confidential data leakage?

A. Limit the data available based on the user's access level
B. Fine-tune the model on your data, hoping it will learn what is appropriate and not
C. Use a strong system prompt to ensure the model aligns with your needs.
D. Add guardrails to filter outputs from the LLM before it is shown to the user

Answer: B

Explanation:
When addressing concerns of hallucination and data leakage in an LLM application for internal company policies, fine-tuning the model on internal data with the hope it learns data boundaries can be problematic:
* Risk of Data Leakage: Fine-tuning on sensitive or confidential data does not guarantee that the model will not inadvertently include or reference this data in its outputs. There's a risk of overfitting to the specific data details, which might lead to unintended leakage.
* Hallucination: Fine-tuning does not necessarily mitigate the model's tendency to hallucinate; in fact, it might exacerbate it if the training data is not comprehensive or representative of all potential queries.
Better Approaches:
* A,C, andDinvolve setting up operational safeguards and constraints that directly address data leakage and ensure responses are aligned with specific user needs and security levels.
Fine-tuning lacks the targeted control needed for such sensitive applications and can introduce new risks, making it an unsuitable approach in this context.

NEW QUESTION # 28
A Generative Al Engineer is developing a RAG system for their company to perform internal document Q&A for structured HR policies, but the answers returned are frequently incomplete and unstructured It seems that the retriever is not returning all relevant context The Generative Al Engineer has experimented with different embedding and response generating LLMs but that did not improve results.
Which TWO options could be used to improve the response quality?
Choose 2 answers

A. Split the document by sentence
B. Increase the document chunk size
C. Use a larger embedding model
D. Add the section header as a prefix to chunks
E. Fine tune the response generation model

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
The problem describes a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system for HR policy Q&A where responses are incomplete and unstructured due to the retriever failing to return sufficient context. The engineer has already tried different embedding and response-generating LLMs without success, suggesting the issue lies in the retrieval process-specifically, how documents are chunked and indexed. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Add the section header as a prefix to chunks
* Adding section headers provides additional context to each chunk, helping the retriever understand the chunk's relevance within the document structure (e.g., "Leave Policy: Annual Leave" vs. just "Annual Leave"). This can improve retrieval precision for structured HR policies.
* Databricks Reference:"Metadata, such as section headers, can be appended to chunks to enhance retrieval accuracy in RAG systems"("Databricks Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: Increase the document chunk size
* Larger chunks include more context per retrieval, reducing the chance of missing relevant information split across smaller chunks. For structured HR policies, this can ensure entire sections or rules are retrieved together.
* Databricks Reference:"Increasing chunk size can improve context completeness, though it may trade off with retrieval specificity"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Split the document by sentence
* Splitting by sentence creates very small chunks, which could exacerbate the problem by fragmenting context further. This is likely why the current system fails-it retrieves incomplete snippets rather than cohesive policy sections.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract opposes this, but the emphasis on context completeness in RAG suggests smaller chunks worsen incomplete responses.
* Option D: Use a larger embedding model
* A larger embedding model might improve vector quality, but the question states that experimenting with different embedding models didn't help. This suggests the issue isn't embedding quality but rather chunking/retrieval strategy.
* Databricks Reference: Embedding models are critical, but not the focus when retrieval context is the bottleneck.
* Option E: Fine tune the response generation model
* Fine-tuning the LLM could improve response coherence, but if the retriever doesn't provide complete context, the LLM can't generate full answers. The root issue is retrieval, not generation.
* Databricks Reference: Fine-tuning is recommended for domain-specific generation, not retrieval fixes ("Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Options A and B address the retrieval issue directly by enhancing chunk context-either through metadata (A) or size (B)-aligning with Databricks' RAG optimization strategies. C would worsen the problem, while D and E don't target the root cause given prior experimentation.

NEW QUESTION # 29
A Generative AI Engineer is creating an LLM-powered application that will need access to up-to-date news articles and stock prices.
The design requires the use of stock prices which are stored in Delta tables and finding the latest relevant news articles by searching the internet.
How should the Generative AI Engineer architect their LLM system?

A. Create an agent with tools for SQL querying of Delta tables and web searching, provide retrieved values to an LLM for generation of response.
B. Use an LLM to summarize the latest news articles and lookup stock tickers from the summaries to find stock prices.
C. Query the Delta table for volatile stock prices and use an LLM to generate a search query to investigate potential causes of the stock volatility.
D. Download and store news articles and stock price information in a vector store. Use a RAG architecture to retrieve and generate at runtime.

Answer: A

Explanation:
To build an LLM-powered system that accesses up-to-date news articles and stock prices, the best approach is tocreate an agentthat has access to specific tools (option D).
* Agent with SQL and Web Search Capabilities:By using an agent-based architecture, the LLM can interact with external tools. The agent can query Delta tables (for up-to-date stock prices) via SQL and perform web searches to retrieve the latest news articles. This modular approach ensures the system can access both structured (stock prices) and unstructured (news) data sources dynamically.
* Why This Approach Works:
* SQL Queries for Stock Prices: Delta tables store stock prices, which the agent can query directly for the latest data.
* Web Search for News: For news articles, the agent can generate search queries and retrieve the most relevant and recent articles, then pass them to the LLM for processing.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Summarizing News for Stock Prices): This convoluted approach would not ensure accuracy when retrieving stock prices, which are already structured and stored in Delta tables.
* B (Stock Price Volatility Queries): While this could retrieve relevant information, it doesn't address how to obtain the most up-to-date news articles.
* C (Vector Store): Storing news articles and stock prices in a vector store might not capture the real-time nature of stock data and news updates, as it relies on pre-existing data rather than dynamic querying.
Thus, using an agent with access to both SQL for querying stock prices and web search for retrieving news articles is the best approach for ensuring up-to-date and accurate responses.

NEW QUESTION # 30
A team wants to serve a code generation model as an assistant for their software developers. It should support multiple programming languages. Quality is the primary objective.
Which of the Databricks Foundation Model APIs, or models available in the Marketplace, would be the best fit?

A. CodeLlama-34B
B. Llama2-70b
C. MPT-7b
D. BGE-large

Answer: A

Explanation:
For a code generation model that supports multiple programming languages and where quality is the primary objective,CodeLlama-34Bis the most suitable choice. Here's the reasoning:
* Specialization in Code Generation:CodeLlama-34B is specifically designed for code generation tasks.
This model has been trained with a focus on understanding and generating code, which makes it particularly adept at handling various programming languages and coding contexts.
* Capacity and Performance:The "34B" indicates a model size of 34 billion parameters, suggesting a high capacity for handling complex tasks and generating high-quality outputs. The large model size typically correlates with better understanding and generation capabilities in diverse scenarios.
* Suitability for Development Teams:Given that the model is optimized for code, it will be able to assist software developers more effectively than general-purpose models. It understands coding syntax, semantics, and the nuances of different programming languages.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Llama2-70b): While also a large model, it's more general-purpose and may not be as fine- tuned for code generation as CodeLlama.
* B (BGE-large): This model may not specifically focus on code generation.
* C (MPT-7b): Smaller than CodeLlama-34B and likely less capable in handling complex code generation tasks at high quality.
Therefore, for a high-quality, multi-language code generation application,CodeLlama-34B(option D) is the best fit.

NEW QUESTION # 31
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system that will answer questions on currently unfolding news topics.
As such, it pulls information from a variety of sources including articles and social media posts. They are concerned about toxic posts on social media causing toxic outputs from their system.
Which guardrail will limit toxic outputs?

A. Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly.
B. Reduce the amount of context Items the system will Include in consideration for its response.
C. Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM.
D. Implement rate limiting

Answer: C

Explanation:
The system answers questions on unfolding news topics using articles and social media, with a concern about toxic outputs from toxic inputs. A guardrail must limit toxicity in the LLM's responses. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM
* Curating input sources (e.g., verified accounts) reduces exposure to toxic content at the data ingestion stage, directly limiting toxic outputs. This is a proactive guardrail aligned with data quality control.
* Databricks Reference:"Control input data quality to mitigate unwanted LLM behavior, such as toxicity"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Implement rate limiting
* Rate limiting controls request frequency, not content quality. It prevents overload but doesn't address toxicity in social media inputs or outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Rate limiting is for performance, not safety:"Use rate limits to manage compute load"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Reduce the amount of context items the system will include in consideration for its response
* Reducing context might limit exposure to some toxic items but risks losing relevant information, and it doesn't specifically target toxicity. It's an indirect, imprecise fix.
* Databricks Reference: Context reduction is for efficiency, not safety:"Adjust context size based on performance needs"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly
* Logging and analyzing responses is reactive, identifying toxicity after it occurs rather than preventing it. Monthly analysis doesn't limit real-time toxic outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Monitoring is for auditing, not prevention:"Log outputs for post-hoc analysis, but use input filters for safety"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the most effective guardrail, proactively filtering toxic inputs from unverified sources, which aligns with Databricks' emphasis on data quality as a primary safety mechanism for LLM systems.

NEW QUESTION # 32
......

There are three versions of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning engine which can allow all kinds of our customers to use conveniently in different situations. They are the PDF, Software and APP online versions. I specially recomend the APP online version of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps. With the online app version of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate actual exam, you can just feel free to practice the questions in our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training materials on all kinds of electronic devices, such as IPAD, telephone, computer and so on!

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Labs: https://www.lead2passexam.com/Databricks/valid-Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-exam-dumps.html

More about Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exams Dumps: If you want to know more about our test preparations materials, you should explore the related Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam Page, The Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions are designed and verified by experienced and certified Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam trainers, Lead2PassExam release the best high-quality Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam original questions to help you most candidates pass exams and achieve their goal surely, How to have some of the most enviable jobs in the IT industry, have a higher social status and bright future and live with more dignity, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate help you to find the answer.

Blurb: Many companies, including Blurb, offer powerful and free software Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate for a PC or Mac that allow you to design professional looking hardcover or softcover photo books that feature your images.

Free PDF Quiz Latest Databricks - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Exam Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample

Select your Facebook application in the Feed Template Console, More about Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exams Dumps: If you want to know more about our test preparations materials, you should explore the related Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam Page.

The Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions are designed and verified by experienced and certified Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam trainers, Lead2PassExam release the best high-quality Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam original questions to help you most candidates pass exams and achieve their goal surely.

How to have some of the most enviable jobs in the IT industry, have a higher social status and bright future and live with more dignity, our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate help you to find the answer.

Of course, their service attitude is definitely worthy of your praise.

LEARN

Jack Robinson Jack Robinson

Biography

Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Labs

Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample & Realistic Free PDF Quiz 2025 Databricks Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Reliable Exam Labs

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q27-Q32):

Free PDF Quiz Latest Databricks - Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Exam Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample